Democracy Matters: The Necessity of a Free and Independent Media

As modern societies grow in size and complexity, the arena for communication and public debate has become dominated by the media: radio and TV, newspapers, books, magazines – and increasingly by newer media such as the Internet and satellite television.

Whether Web logs (known as blogs) or printed books, the media in a democracy have a number of overlapping but distinctive functions that remain fundamentally unchanged. One is to inform and educate.  To make intelligent decisions about public policy, people need accurate, timely, unbiased information. However, another media function may be to advocate, even without pretense of objectivity.

Media audiences may benefit from various, conflicting opinions, in order to obtain a wide range of viewpoints.  This role is especially important during election campaigns, when few voters will have the opportunity to see, much less talk with, candidates in person.

A second function of the media is to serve as a watchdog over government and other powerful institutions in the society.  By holding to a standard of independence and objectivity, however imperfectly, the news media can expose the truth behind the claims of governments and hold public officials accountable for their actions.

The media can take a more active role in public debate through editorials or investigative reporting, and serve as a forum for groups and individuals to express their opinions through letters and articles, and postings on the Web, with divergent points of view.

Commentators point to another increasingly important role for the media: “setting the agenda.”  Since they can’t report everything, the news media must choose which issues to highlight and which to ignore. In short, they tend to decide what news is and what isn’t.

These decisions, in turn, influence the public’s perception of what issues are most important.  Unlike countries where the news is controlled by the government, however, the media in a democracy cannot simply manipulate or disregard issues at will.  Their competitors, after all, are free to call attention to their own lists of important issues.

Citizens of a democracy live with the conviction that through the open exchange of ideas and opinions, truth will eventually win out over falsehood, values of others will be better understood, areas of compromise more clearly defined, and the path of progress opened.

The greater the volume of such exchanges, the better.  The American writer E.B. White once put it this way: “The press in our free country is reliable and useful not because of its good character but because of its great diversity.  As long as there are many owners, each pursuing his own brand of truth, we the people have the opportunity to arrive at the truth and dwell in the light. ...There is safety in numbers.”

 

From “Democracy in Brief,” Bureau of International Information Programs (IIP), U.S. Department of State, available at http://usinfo.state.gov